阅读视图

Loss

Me, posturing with my comment, trying to seem smart on a smart person’s blog:

The detritus from abandoned blogs and terminated online relationships makes my last 12 years hard to revisit. I felt like some of those bloggers were among my best friends until one day they disappeared for good. I often think about looking them up, but I realize that because they vanished, they may want to stay lost. I wonder who will mourn when I log off for good.

Bill wrote about a disappeared blogger. About reaching out and receiving a disappointing reply. He wrote about other stuff too, but the lost friend part hit home. It made me want to respond. The attrition is endless. They leave for Substack. They become bored. Their muse takes flight. They birth a baby. They lose their voice. They get a life. Whatever. They vanish. Usually, it takes time. They write less. They read less. They take a break. They return months later promising to do better and then evaporate entirely.

I miss them. Do they miss me? My early days of writing featured vulnerability—newfound sobriety, growing insight into my Tourette, my OCD, my anxiety and depression. I cut myself open and spilled out prose. Those I read did the same. We built a community of injured souls. We understood and supported one another. I’m not sure how I would have succeeded without them.

One by one, they disappear. At first, I usually don’t notice. One day I think, “Huh, when was the last time Robyn commented on a post. When was the last time she liked one.” I check her blog and see she hasn’t written in weeks. She never posted again.

In time, others took her place, but they fell away as well. And then more. My desire to look them up—cyberstalk them, google their email and drop them a line—comes in waves. A strong one now, obviously, writing these thoughts. I once met up with Robyn at a trail race. We had so much in common. The running, of course, and punk music. Social anxiety. Autism—her son (definitely) and me (possibly). Plus, Gettysburg, her husband is a history nut.

She told me her family once took a photo outside the library where I work. She tried to guess which window was mine. She didn’t come in, social anxiety and all. The time we met was awkward. We tried to talk while we ran. Our paces mismatched. Me, out of breath, Robyn, itching to run ahead. Coffee would have worked better, assuming a pair of social misfits can hold a conversation.

One day I’ll quit blogging. I won’t fade away like most. I’ll drop out cold turkey. White knuckles, like I did with alcohol. To others, it will seem abrupt, but I’m sure I’ll have agonized over the decision for months. Will you notice? Will you reach out? Ask if I’m all right? Tell me what I meant to you… if anything? Blogging, I think, is dying. Different media, newer media is taking over. I suspect each of us will bail eventually. Find different hobbies, different ways to express ourselves. Or not. Possibly some of us will simply mourn one more lost bit of our lives.

Photo from Pixabay

  •  

电解质水平替、该不该喝酒及智商堪忧

电解质水平替的来龙去脉

电解质水平替事关一位网红大V——Fenng,更容易被记住的是他的头像,最初因搜索科技资讯 App 比较,批量下载了小道消息,那个看起来欧美画风的挺欠的头像让人记忆犹新,但后面内容似乎不更新了,到后面我的朋友在北京创业,做了一个 news + NLP 的新闻提炼的应用,我也无意间发现了类似的 Readhub,了解到后面的无码科技,正是它们的产品。

Fenng 现在算是 X 上的网红,常有各种争议的言论,都是群友转来看,我平时不大关注。这次他提到电解质水的平替太贵,有人说盐兑点水就是,他却说人“智商堪忧”,他这句言语从心理学上理解,有些自我攻击或者自我鄙夷。在我看来,作为社媒言论是不妥的,甚至有点愚蠢,从领域常识上看,也与医疗领域科技产品公司负责人身份不符。

一方面,就电解质水的平替问题本身来说。基于对盐汽水认知和户外运动经验,是经验有效的。曾见过工地的工人分发饮用盐汽水,且户外运动出汗非常多时,一些退伍军人也直接补充盐水。从常识上说,电解质和水都在人体内,比例须达到一种平衡,通过消化道直接补充电解制水,人在吸收时,是有渗透调节的,因此食盐和水比例的一定阈值范围内,人都可以自己调节这种平衡,这种比例是否恰当,只要不过量补水和过度放盐就行。在需要补充电解质时,很少有人会纠结于盐和水的比例问题而放弃补水,一小勺盐加到一瓶水里,就直接喝了。

另一方面,人体电解质主要有钠离子 Na+、钾离子 K+、钙离子 Ca2+、镁离子 Mg2+、氯离子 Cl-,食盐中也主要含有这些离子,它们主要负责调节体液平衡、血压、心跳、肌肉收缩、神经功能等。你很少在现实世界听到因运动后过度补充盐分而出现问题的事件,这本身可说明人对盐水比例的容忍度是非常高的。

所以,加点盐的水作为人体补充电解制水的平替是 OK 的。

该不该喝酒

酒是世界文化的一部分,这不是巧合。密闭放久的事物都会产生这种类似的气味,祖先们经过尝试发现,它们居然可以喝,而且喝完后仿佛还会进入一种不可名状的状态。我们是听着先人饮酒的故事,看着祖辈饮酒,到自己饮酒的一代人。

但记得去年时候,看到老高讲酒是毒药一集,说最近科研表明,酒精和人的健康总是负相关,总是和人的疾病正相关。这颠覆了少量饮酒给人带来好处的常识,就是说,哪怕是喝一滴酒,都是喝了毒药。

而在生活面上,无论是线下的酒吧和线上的卖场,酒都是很重要的品类,刚挤进超市五强的盒马,就推出非常多的精酿啤酒,广受欢迎。

所以问题到了,如果酒是毒药,为什么大家要卖;这个问题的提问方式,如果烟有害健康,为什么会卖?是人不理智,还是卖的人坏,或者这就是世界的 Bug,所有的人都装作不知道和其中没有矛盾。

我是这么看待的,夏天日常我也喝啤酒,品酒和非常少量的红酒,偶尔白酒,甚至还有一些喜欢,但不酗酒,喝的不多。一般是啤酒一罐(类似可乐),红酒一两杯,白酒二两的样子。无论研究怎么说,酒和菜肴搭配还是有一种最简单的乐趣。

在相信科研和相信经验上,我相信能重现和验证的科研结论,但我和大多数喝酒吸烟的人一样,不太在意这些,经验告诉我,酒对人的影响也许是负面的,但酒对健康的影响没有想象的那么大。影响人健康的因素中,它占不到主因。

矛盾事物

所有的人在一生中最大的矛盾在于,明明都是要死的,却都装得那么永生。

这可能就是人性中最大的盲点:虚伪且无明。

二分法提供了解构矛盾事物的视角,它说矛盾是统一的。

人在快乐和悲伤时都喝酒,这说明人非常清醒,即想早点死却也不想死,这点,连神也不懂,所以才创造了我们。

  •